Talk:Remote procedure call

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Remote procedure call article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Networking / Software High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

First/Second class RPC

I think inclusion of an explanation between first and second class RPC calls is necessary, with examples of each.

Cheesysam (talk) 20:07, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IDL and Windows COM objects

It is my understanding that Windows COM objects (originally Object Linking and Embedding or at least the linking part of it) were based on RPC, at least to the extent that OLE and COM use an Interface Definition Language. I think it would help to emphasize that connection. I think it would help to at least include a description of the IDL or whatever it is that RPC uses. Sam Tomato (talk) 06:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DCOM is based on RPC 82.82.138.197 (talk) 18:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No The only difference between COM and DCOM is the communication part. COM uses type libraries that are compiled Microsoft Interface Definition Language. Sam Tomato (talk) 23:47, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There should at least be something about the Interface description language; it is fundamental to RPCs and is more important than much of the other stuff in this article. Sam Tomato (talk) 23:47, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spyne link refers to something else

The link to Spyne on this page refers to the wrong Spyne. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.174.183.31 (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite article

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User: 109.77.xx.xx and the indefinite article and Talk:XMPP#Please discuss changes to the indefinite article. Andrewa (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Remoting"

Remoting redirects to this article. What is the meaning with respect to RPC? --Abdull (talk) 13:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Remote procedure call. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090105145818/http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id%3B1422447371%3Bpp%3B3%3Bfp%3B4194304%3Bfpid%3B1 to http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1422447371;pp;3;fp;4194304;fpid;1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok